HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:20:43 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.6 (Fedora)
Last-Modified: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 08:14:23 GMT
ETag: "73cc3-4e9-f12c15c0"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 1257
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Reasons PRO
- Let the market take care of "language wars". Allowing a few different languages to fill different niches strengthens the standard.
- Add interactivity to HTML, VRML, and other formats in a uniform way, without reinventing the wheel every time.
Reasons CON
- Doing it right raises the complexity level somewhat.
Applications
Proposed Solutions
Updated: Tue Apr 11 1995
Up to Client extensibility.
Home to Interactive Standards Home Page.
- 1.
Using URLs and canonical bindings (Dave Raggett)
- 1.
Resource Naming (Linas Vepstas)